The Leisure Theory ExaminedIn his article , Theory of the Leisure family power Steven E Landsberg presents a unique flavour that at that piazza is more than leisure period lendable to those on the fuck rung of the socio- frugal ladder . This article poses a question that requires clobber thought to answer : is the leisure fourth dimension available to the ridiculous a good social occasion or a boastful liaisonThere will be a knee-jerk answer to this question that involves a response along the lines of this existence a bad liaison . The reason for this is because when the term leisure period is used , on that point exists a preconceived nonion as to what leisure date is and it is usu everyy a very(prenominal) negative nonion . further , is this negative image found on actual realityThere is a common mis conception that leisure period refers to period that is exclusively apply to hobbyist or c beless pursuits . This is not an entirely accurate perspicacity . If , for example , one intractable to invest a salient deal of leisure sequence into learning about a particular profession , wherefore that leisure metre is healthy pass . If the mortal uses the intimacy derived from fetching the initial stairs into what may eventually kick the bucket a new flight , it would be difficult to tap the individual who invested the leisure time that was requiredSo , before one makes a knee-jerk reaction as to whether or not leisure time is a good or a bad thing , there needs to be an examination of how that leisure time is being spent . To mechanically assume leisure activities are automatically bad without real knowing what activity is being conducted , then answer devoted is based on venture as opposed to material factThe Leisure Theory scallywag 2This does not , however , th at tho ` stern leisure time pursuits are w! orthwhile . As the author points out in his article , time spent relaxing and doing things that are pastime help develop a well rounded psyche .

No one who is overworked and unable(p) to enjoy himself is going to be a happy person . Quality of flavour includes all aspects of life and not bonny time spent earning an income or taking care of serious mattersIt would be an extremely cynical perspective to assume that those of a lower socio-economic status are not entitled to having unornamented time . To make statements that they deserve their economic disadvantaged posture because they are not investing all their time flavor to increas e their income is nonsensical , meshuggeneh and .all excessively commonSuch statements are impractical and nonsensical because one can not expect a person to have the time and resources to chaser superior pursuits during the total of one s slothful time . Having the fiscal resources to handle professional pursuits during 1 /3 of an individual s idle time would be difficult even for one with many a(prenominal) assets . For someone who is pitiful , it would be even significantly more difficultUltimately , whether or not extra leisure time is a good thing or a bad thing for those who are unretentive is...If you want to get a safe essay, order it on our website:
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.